Can sincerity not be achieved through style? One definition for the word 'style' in the OED states that, 'in generalised sense', style consists of 'those features of literary composition which belong to the form and expression rather than to the substance of the thought or matter expressed'. Wilde assumes, in writing that 'style, not sincerity is the vital thing' 'in matters of grave importance', that style and sincerity are in some way opposed. Their very different treatments of the subject lead us to question the validity of Wilde's epithet.ĭoes it imply that Daisy, the perhaps more 'sincere' of the two texts, is less effective than Earnest? Is Earnest insincere and Daisy lacking in style? A study of the works and the philosophies of writing behind them is perhaps necessary. Wilde says: 'in matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity is the vital thing.' Society is the 'matter of grave importance' at hand in Earnest and Daisy, and critics seem to agree that Wilde and James both succeed in their works' respective criticism of it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |